United States v. Steven Carr
United States v. Steven Carr
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Steven Donewan Carr appeals the district court’s order granting his motion for a reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). * We have re *862 viewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Carr, No. 5:98-cr-00246-RLV-2 (W.D.N.C. July 17, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Although the district court granted Carr’s § 3582(c)(2) motion, it did not reduce Carr’s *862 sentence to the full extent he requested.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.