U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2012

Donald Bailey, Jr. v. D. Braxton

Donald Bailey, Jr. v. D. Braxton
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided October 16, 2012

Donald Bailey, Jr. v. D. Braxton

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-7235

DONALD RAY BAILEY, JR., Petitioner - Appellant, v. D.A. BRAXTON, Warden, K.M.C.C., Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District Judge. (3:12-cv-00422-JRS)

Submitted: October 11, 2012 Decided: October 16, 2012

Before KING, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Donald Ray Bailey, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Donald Ray Bailey, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for an extension of time to file a § 2254 petition and dismissing the case without prejudice. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we grant Bailey leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Bailey v. Braxton, No. 3:12-cv-00422-JRS (E.D. Va. July 9, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.