United States v. Sean Robinson
United States v. Sean Robinson
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-7206
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. SEAN ANTHONY ROBINSON, a/k/a Black, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District Judge. (3:06-cr-00204-HEH-1)
Submitted: October 11, 2012 Decided: October 16, 2012
Before KING, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Sean Anthony Robinson, Appellant Pro Se. Gurney Wingate Grant, II, Roderick Charles Young, Assistant United States Attorneys, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Sean Anthony Robinson appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motions. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Robinson, No. 3:06-cr-00204-HEH-1 (E.D.
Va. June 29, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.