U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2012

United States v. Eric Studwell

United States v. Eric Studwell
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided November 1, 2012 · Gregory, Motz, Per Curiam, Shedd
486 F. App'x 373

United States v. Eric Studwell

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Eric Studwell appeals from the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006) motion for reduction of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Studwell, No. 4:04-cr00056-RBS-FBS-1 (E.D. Va. filed Nov. 29, 2011; entered Nov. 30, 2011). Accordingly, we affirm the district *374 court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.