John Fishback v. State of Maryland

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

John Fishback v. State of Maryland

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-6666

JOHN WILLIAM FISHBACK,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

STATE OF MARYLAND; CIRCUIT COURT FOR BALTIMORE CITY; MARYLAND COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS; CITY OF BALTIMORE; DANIEL H. GINSBURG; BENNETT & BAIR; ARTHUR M. FRANK; FRANK M. CONAWAY; LESLIE D. GRADET; GARI BAIR; EMANUEL BROWN; ALLEN L. SCHWARTZ; TWILLA DRIGGINS; PATRICIA C. JESSEMY,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Senior District Judge. (1:12-cv-00927-JFM)

Submitted: October 2, 2012 Decided: November 5, 2012

Before NIEMEYER, DUNCAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John William Fishback, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

John William Fishback appeals the district court’s

order dismissing his

42 U.S.C. § 1983

(2006) complaint under

28 U.S.C. § 1915

(e)(2)(B) (2006). We have reviewed the record and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the

reasons stated by the district court. See Fishback v. Maryland,

No. 1:12-cv-00927-JFM (D. Md. Apr. 4, 2012). We deny Fishback’s

motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished