John Fishback v. State of Maryland
John Fishback v. State of Maryland
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-6666
JOHN WILLIAM FISHBACK,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
STATE OF MARYLAND; CIRCUIT COURT FOR BALTIMORE CITY; MARYLAND COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS; CITY OF BALTIMORE; DANIEL H. GINSBURG; BENNETT & BAIR; ARTHUR M. FRANK; FRANK M. CONAWAY; LESLIE D. GRADET; GARI BAIR; EMANUEL BROWN; ALLEN L. SCHWARTZ; TWILLA DRIGGINS; PATRICIA C. JESSEMY,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Senior District Judge. (1:12-cv-00927-JFM)
Submitted: October 2, 2012 Decided: November 5, 2012
Before NIEMEYER, DUNCAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
John William Fishback, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
John William Fishback appeals the district court’s
order dismissing his
42 U.S.C. § 1983(2006) complaint under
28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2006). We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. See Fishback v. Maryland,
No. 1:12-cv-00927-JFM (D. Md. Apr. 4, 2012). We deny Fishback’s
motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished