United States v. David Beeks

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

United States v. David Beeks

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-7457

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

DAVID LAMONT BEEKS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., Senior District Judge. (6:01-cr-00828-HMH-12)

Submitted: November 2, 2012 Decided: November 6, 2012

Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

David Lamont Beeks, Appellant Pro Se. Elizabeth Jean Howard, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

David Lamont Beeks appeals the district court’s orders

denying his

18 U.S.C. § 3582

(c)(2) (2006) motion for sentence

reduction and denying his subsequent motion for reconsideration.

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm the court’s order denying Beeks’

§ 3582(c)(2) motion for the reasons stated by the district

court. United States v. Beeks, No. 6:01-cr-00828-HMH-12 (D.S.C.

July 27, 2012).

We also conclude that the district court lacked

authority to entertain Beeks’ motion for reconsideration. See

United States v. Goodwyn,

596 F.3d 233, 235-36

(4th Cir. 2010).

Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order denying Beeks’

motion for reconsideration. We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented

in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished