United States v. Dirk Ladson
United States v. Dirk Ladson
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-7249
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
DIRK LADSON, a/k/a Dezo, a/k/a Eugene Martin,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (2:93-cr-00162-RAJ-10)
Submitted: November 2, 2012 Decided: November 6, 2012
Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Dirk Ladson, Appellant Pro Se. Melissa Elaine O’Boyle, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Dirk Ladson appeals the district court’s order denying
his
18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for sentence reduction
based on Amendment 750 to the Sentencing Guidelines. Our review
of the record demonstrates that Amendment 750 did not alter
Ladson’s Guidelines range. Accordingly, we affirm the district
court’s order. United States v. Ladson, No. 2:93-cr-00162-RAJ-
10 (E.D. Va. filed July 12, 2012; entered July 13, 2012). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid in the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished