United States v. Arthur Wright
United States v. Arthur Wright
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-7047
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
ARTHUR E. WRIGHT,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District Judge. (3:06-cr-00452-JRS-1)
Submitted: November 2, 2012 Decided: November 7, 2012
Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Arthur E. Wright, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen Wiley Miller, Elizabeth Wu, Assistant United States Attorneys, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Arthur E. Wright appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion for a sentence reduction under
18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. United States v. Wright, No. 3:06-cr-
00452-JRS-1 (E.D.N.C. May 8, 2012). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished