United States v. Tavaris Dunlap
United States v. Tavaris Dunlap
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-7030
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
TAVARIS LEON DUNLAP, a/k/a Onion,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Terry L. Wooten, District Judge. (4:07-cr-00482-TLW-3)
Submitted: November 2, 2012 Decided: November 7, 2012
Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Tavaris Leon Dunlap, Appellant Pro Se. Arthur Bradley Parham, Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Tavaris Leon Dunlap appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion for appointment of counsel. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v.
Dunlap, No. 4:07-cr-00482-TLW-3 (D.S.C. May 30, 2012). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished