United States v. Tavaris Dunlap

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

United States v. Tavaris Dunlap

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-7030

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

TAVARIS LEON DUNLAP, a/k/a Onion,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Terry L. Wooten, District Judge. (4:07-cr-00482-TLW-3)

Submitted: November 2, 2012 Decided: November 7, 2012

Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Tavaris Leon Dunlap, Appellant Pro Se. Arthur Bradley Parham, Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Tavaris Leon Dunlap appeals the district court’s order

denying his motion for appointment of counsel. We have reviewed

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm

for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v.

Dunlap, No. 4:07-cr-00482-TLW-3 (D.S.C. May 30, 2012). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished