Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Anthony L. Olvis appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion to reduce his sentence pursuant to Amendment 750 to the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual (2011). We have reviewed the record and *120 conclude that the district court properly determined that Olvis was not eligible for a sentence reduction because Amendment 750 did not lower his Guidelines range. To the extent that Olvis reasserts the arguments he raised in the district court regarding the calculation of the drug quantity attributable to him, those arguments are foreclosed by Dillon v. United States, - U.S. -, 130 S.Ct. 2683, 2693-94, 177 L.Ed.2d 271 (2010). Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Olvis, No. 4:95-cr-00038-RGD-1 (E.D. Va. filed May 9, 2012 & entered May 10, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.