United States v. Llewellen Smith

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

United States v. Llewellen Smith

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-7003

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

LLEWELLEN FERNANDO SMITH, a/k/a Louie,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. (3:96-cr-00066-REP-20)

Submitted: November 2, 2012 Decided: November 7, 2012

Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Llewellen Fernando Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Dana James Boente, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia; Stephen Wiley Miller, Elizabeth Wu, Assistant United States Attorneys, Brian R. Hood, David John Novak, Brian L. Whisler, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia; Andrew Gerald McBride, WILEY REIN, LLP, Washington, DC, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Llewellen Fernando Smith appeals the district court’s

order denying relief on his

18 U.S.C. § 3582

(c) (2006) motion.

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. United States v. Smith, No. 3:96-cr-00066-REP-20 (E.D.

Va. May 25, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished