United States v. Michael Corpening

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

United States v. Michael Corpening

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-6915

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

MICHAEL CHRISTOPHER CORPENING, a/k/a Michael Lewis Corpening, a/k/a Mike Boggie,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Richard L. Voorhees, District Judge. (5:03-cr-00037-RLV-DCK-7)

Submitted: November 2, 2012 Decided: November 7, 2012

Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael Christopher Corpening, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, Gretchen C. F. Shappert, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Michael Christopher Corpening appeals the district

court’s order denying his

18 U.S.C. § 3582

(c)(2) (2006) motion

for sentence reduction based on Amendment 750 to the Sentencing

Guidelines. Our review of the record demonstrates that

Amendment 750 did not alter Corpening’s Guidelines range. See

United States v. Munn,

595 F.3d 183, 187

(4th Cir. 2010).

Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. See United

States v. Corpening, No. 5:03-cr-00037-RLV-DCK-7 (W.D.N.C. May

10, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid in the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished