Irma Williams v. David Sabo

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Irma Williams v. David Sabo

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-1689

IRMA WILLIAMS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

DAVID SABO; CYNTHIA BREYFOGLE; MARYANN CURL; CAROLE RIVERS; UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Martin K. Reidinger, District Judge. (1:11-cv-00219-MR-DLH)

Submitted: November 2, 2012 Decided: November 7, 2012

Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

George W. Saenger, ADAMS, HENDON, CARSON, CROW & SAENGER, PA, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellant. Anne M. Tompkins, United States Attorney, Paul B. Taylor, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Irma Williams appeals the district court’s order

adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation to substitute the

United States as the party Defendant and dismissing her civil

action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court. See Williams v. Sabo, No. 1:11-cv-00219-MR-DLH

(W.D.N.C. Apr. 25, 2012). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented

in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished