U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2012

John Fishback v. Bobby Shearin

John Fishback v. Bobby Shearin
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided November 8, 2012

John Fishback v. Bobby Shearin

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-6834

JOHN W. FISHBACK, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. BOBBY P. SHEARIN, Warden; RICHARD J. GRAHAM, JR., Asst.

Warden; GARY D. MAYNARD, Secretary of Public Safety and Correctional Services; UNKNOWN EMPLOYEES, FORMER EMPLOYEES, CONTRACTORS AND FORMER CONTRACTORS OF THE NORTH BRANCH CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION AND ROXBURY CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, Defendants – Appellees, and JOHN A. ROWLEY, Defendant.

No. 12-7137

JOHN W. FISHBACK, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. BOBBY P. SHEARIN, Warden; RICHARD J. GRAHAM, JR., Asst.

Warden; GARY D. MAYNARD, Secretary of Public Safety and Correctional Services; UNKNOWN EMPLOYEES, FORMER EMPLOYEES, CONTRACTORS AND FORMER CONTRACTORS OF THE NORTH BRANCH CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION AND ROXBURY CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, Defendants – Appellees, and JOHN A. ROWLEY, Defendant.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Senior District Judge. (1:11-cv-00612-JFM)

Submitted: October 25, 2012 Decided: November 8, 2012

Before NIEMEYER, DUNCAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John W. Fishback, Appellant Pro Se. Stephanie Judith Lane- Weber, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: John W. Fishback appeals the district court’s orders denying his motions and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Fishback v. Shearin, No. 1:11-cv- 00612-JFM (D. Md. June 15, 2012; Apr. 3, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.