Christopher Wills v. Charles Rosenberg
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Christopher A. Wills appeals * the district court’s orders dismissing his civil ac *822 tion asserting claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) and Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971), and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm substantially for the reasons stated by the district court. Wills v. Rosenberg, No. 1:11-cv-01317-LMB-JFA, 2012 WL 113676 (E.D.Va. Jan. 13, 2012 & Feb. 2, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Wills was required to file his notice of appeal by Monday, April 9, 2012. See Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(1)(C); Fed. R.App. P. 26(a)(1)(C). While the County Defendants argue that this appeal is untimely, we conclude that the record adequately demonstrates timely filing. See Fed. R.App. P. 4(c)(1); Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266, 270, 108 S.Ct. 2379, 101 L.Ed.2d 245 (1988).
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Christopher A. WILLS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Charles P. ROSENBERG; Donna Marie Stephenson; John Robert Stone; Cindy Lundberg; Michael Feightner; Nathaniel J. McFadden; Reginald A. Johnson; Maurice Simmons; James Black; Mr. Hamed; Mr. Asib; Hellen Fayeh, Defendants-Appellees
- Status
- Unpublished