U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2012

Bartola Pacetti v. Mark Millard

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided November 19, 2012 · Davis, Keenan, Per Curiam, Thacker

488 F. App'x 765

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Bartola J. Pacetti appeals the district court’s orders granting the Appellees’ motions to dismiss the claims against them in his civil action. * We have reviewed the *766 record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Pacetti v. Millard, No. 1:11-cv-01293-LO-TCB (E.D. Va. May 3, 2012 & filed Apr. 17, 2012, entered Apr. 18, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Although this appeal was interlocutory when the notice of appeal was filed, we have jurisdiction over the appeal because the district court has since entered final judgment. See In re Bryson, 406 F.3d 284, 289 (4th Cir. 2005); Equip. Fin. Grp., Inc. v. Traverse Computer Brokers, 973 F.2d 345, 347-48 (4th Cir. 1992).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.