UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-7085

NATHANIEL SINGLETON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

WARDEN RIVERA; ASSOCIATE WARDEN WEIR; ASSIST WITTMAN; DR. PHILLIPES; COMMANDER GLENN; COMMANDER BRADY; MR. AGRLINE; D. COUICK; OFFICER MS. VENTON; OFFICER MS. JOHNSON,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Aiken. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge. (1:10-cv-01909-RBH)

Submitted: November 20, 2012 Decided: November 26, 2012

Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and SHEDD and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Nathaniel Singleton, Appellant Pro Se. Marshall Prince, II, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Nathaniel Singleton appeals the district court’s order

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying

relief on his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown

Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics,

(1971).

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. See Singleton v. Warden Rivera, No. 1:10-cv-01909-RBH

(D.S.C. June 12, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2