UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-1853

MARIE THERESE ASSA'AD-FALTAS,

Party-in-Interest - Appellant,

and

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

NIKKI HALEY, in her official capacity as the Governor of South Carolina; STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Richard Mark Gergel, District Judge. (2:11-cv-02958-RMG)

Submitted: November 20, 2012 Decided: November 26, 2012

Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and SHEDD and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Marie Therese Assa’ad-Faltas, Appellant Pro Se. Robert D. Cook, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF SOUTH CAROLINA, James Emory Smith, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2 PER CURIAM:

Marie Therese Assa’ad-Faltas, M.D., M.P.H., appeals

the district court’s order denying her Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)

motion asking that the district court reverse its denial of her

motion to intervene in the district court action. Assa’ad-

Faltas has also moved for in forma pauperis status. We have

reviewed the record and find that Assa’ad-Faltas’s motion failed

to establish any of the grounds necessary for Rule 60(b) relief.

Accordingly, although we grant Assa’ad-Faltas’s application for

in forma pauperis status, we affirm the district court’s order.

See Assa’ad-Faltas v. Haley, No. 2:11-cv-02958-RMG (D.S.C. June

27, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

3