Ronnie Craddock v. Beaufort County Sheriffs Dep't

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Ronnie Craddock v. Beaufort County Sheriffs Dep't

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-1831

RONNIE WAYNE CRADDOCK; SHERRIE DENISE HAWKINS,

Plaintiffs - Appellants,

v.

BEAUFORT COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT; BEAUFORT COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE; SHERIFF ALAN JORDAN; DEPUTY SHERIFF JEREMY WALLACE; DEPUTY SHERIFF CHARLES ROSE; DEPUTY SHERIFF NINA SHOAF; DEPUTY SHERIFF JAMES STALLINGS; DEPUTY SHERIFF KEITH OWENS; DEPUTY SHERIFF C. R. SMITH,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Greenville. James C. Dever, III, Chief District Judge. (4:09-cv-00092-D)

Submitted: November 20, 2012 Decided: November 26, 2012

Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and SHEDD and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ronnie Wayne Craddock, Sherrie Denise Hawkins, Appellants Pro Se. Christopher J. Geis, WOMBLE CARLYLE SANDRIDGE & RICE, PLLC, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Ronnie Wayne Craddock and Sherrie Denise Hawkins

appeal the district court’s order denying relief on their

42 U.S.C. § 1983

(2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the

reasons stated by the district court. Craddock v. Beaufort

Cnty. Sheriffs Dep’t, No. 4:09-cv-00092-D (E.D.N.C. Sept. 26,

2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished