U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2012

Ronnie Craddock v. Beaufort County Sheriffs Dep't

Ronnie Craddock v. Beaufort County Sheriffs Dep't
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided November 26, 2012

Ronnie Craddock v. Beaufort County Sheriffs Dep't

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-1831

RONNIE WAYNE CRADDOCK; SHERRIE DENISE HAWKINS, Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. BEAUFORT COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT; BEAUFORT COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE; SHERIFF ALAN JORDAN; DEPUTY SHERIFF JEREMY WALLACE; DEPUTY SHERIFF CHARLES ROSE; DEPUTY SHERIFF NINA SHOAF; DEPUTY SHERIFF JAMES STALLINGS; DEPUTY SHERIFF KEITH OWENS; DEPUTY SHERIFF C. R. SMITH, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Greenville. James C. Dever, III, Chief District Judge. (4:09-cv-00092-D)

Submitted: November 20, 2012 Decided: November 26, 2012

Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and SHEDD and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ronnie Wayne Craddock, Sherrie Denise Hawkins, Appellants Pro Se. Christopher J. Geis, WOMBLE CARLYLE SANDRIDGE & RICE, PLLC, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Ronnie Wayne Craddock and Sherrie Denise Hawkins appeal the district court’s order denying relief on their 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Craddock v. Beaufort Cnty. Sheriffs Dep’t, No. 4:09-cv-00092-D (E.D.N.C. Sept. 26, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.