Dickinson Adionser v. United States

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Dickinson Adionser v. United States

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-7639

DICKINSON NORMAN ADIONSER,

Plaintiff - Appellant, v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; UNITED STATES DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION AGENCY,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Roger W. Titus, District Judge. (8:12- cv-00700-RWT)

Submitted: November 20, 2012 Decided: November 27, 2012

Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and SHEDD and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Dickinson Norman Adionser, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Dickinson Norman Adionser appeals the district court’s

orders denying relief on his civil complaint filed pursuant to

the Privacy Act of 1974, 5 U.S.C. § 552a (2006), the Freedom of

Information Act,

5 U.S.C. § 552

(2006), and the Federal

Declaratory Judgment Act,

28 U.S.C. § 2201

(2006), and denying

his subsequent motion to alter or amend. We have reviewed the

record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm.

Adionser v. United States, No. 8:12-cv-00700-RWT (D. Md. Mar.

20, 2012, July 24, 2012). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented

in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished