United States v. Ronnie Knox

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

United States v. Ronnie Knox

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-7523

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

RONNIE EARL KNOX,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Frank D. Whitney, District Judge. (3:03-cr-00220-FDW-4)

Submitted: November 20, 2012 Decided: November 27, 2012

Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and SHEDD and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ronnie Earl Knox, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Ronnie Earl Knox appeals the district court’s orders

denying his

18 U.S.C. § 3582

(c)(2) (2006) motion to reduce his

sentence and his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm. United States v. Knox, No. 3:03-cr-00220-FDW-4

(W.D.N.C. July 16, 2012, Aug. 1, 2012). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished