Ricky Bartlett v. Max Robeson
Ricky Bartlett v. Max Robeson
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-7156
RICKY BARTLETT, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. MAX ROBESON; ANTHONY FORBES; JON WORTHINGTON, Defendants – Appellees, and CAMDEN SHERIFF’S DEPT., Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (5:11-ct-03008-BO)
Submitted: November 20, 2012 Decided: November 27, 2012
Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and SHEDD and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ricky Bartlett, Appellant Pro Se. Sonny Sade Haynes, WOMBLE CARLYLE SANDRIDGE & RICE, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Ricky Bartlett appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint and his numerous motions for appointment of counsel. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Bartlett v. Robeson, No. 5:11-ct-03008-BO (E.D.N.C. Apr. 21 & June 15, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.