Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

This is the second suit by Appellant Three Lower Counties Community Health Services, Inc. (“TLC”) against the Maryland Department of Health and Mental Hygiene (“the Department”) related to Medicaid reimbursements to come before this court on appeal. TLC is a nonprofit Maryland corporation that provides healthcare services to low-income patients and Medicaid enrollees. The Department is responsible for administering the Medicaid program in Maryland. TLC alleged in this lawsuit that (1) the Department underpaid its supplemental payments to TLC for care TLC provided to in-network Medicaid patients, and (2) the Department failed to ensure TLC was compensated for the emergency services it provided to out-of-network Medicaid patients. TLC sought full payment for past and future services rendered.

TLC moved for summary judgment. In a January 5, 2011, order, the district court denied TLC’s motion on its supplemental payment claim, concluding that it amounted to a claim for retroactive monetary relief barred by 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The court granted TLC’s motion as to its out-of-network emergency services claim, find *602 ing that the Department had not complied with the requirement set forth in 42 U.S.C. § 1396b (m)(2)(A)(vii) that it contract with managed care organizations to provide reimbursements for out-of-network emergency services, as interpreted by this Court in Three Lower Counties Community Health Services, Inc. v. Maryland (Three Lower Counties I), 498 F.3d 294 (4th Cir. 2007).

Both TLC and the Department moved to alter or amend the judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e). TLC also moved to enforce our decision in Three Lower Counties I and a subsequent district court order issued on remand. The district court denied TLC’s motions in an August 23, 2011, order and the Department’s motion in an October 19, 2011, order. TLC timely appealed and the Department filed a timely cross-appeal.

Having carefully reviewed the briefs, record, and applicable law and considered the parties’ oral arguments, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court in its thorough opinions. See Three Lower Cntys. Cmty. Health Servs., Inc. v. Md. Dep’t of Health & Mental Hygiene, No. WMN-10-2488, 2011 WL 4986133, (D.Md. Oct. 19, 2011); 2011 WL 3740781 (D.Md. Aug. 23, 2011); 2011 WL 31444 (D.Md. Jan. 5, 2011).

AFFIRMED.