United States v. Rodney Allen

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

United States v. Rodney Allen

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-7435

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

RODNEY LAMONT ALLEN,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Martin K. Reidinger, District Judge. (1:07-cr-00032-MR-1)

Submitted: November 13, 2012 Decided: December 18, 2012

Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Rodney Lamont Allen, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Rodney Lamont Allen appeals the district court’s order

denying his

18 U.S.C. § 3582

(c)(2) (2006) motion for reduction

of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court. United States v. Allen, No. 1:07-cr-00032-MR-1

(W.D.N.C. Aug. 10, 2012). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented

in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished