Herbert Robinson v. Sergeant Wilson

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Herbert Robinson v. Sergeant Wilson

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-7427

HERBERT ALONZO ROBINSON,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

SERGEANT JILL WILSON, a/k/a Wilson; LOGAN FEY, a/k/a Frye; JOHN DOES, in their individual capacity including any and all Jane Does; MICHELLE REDDEN, a/k/a Ms. Redden; SERGEANT CHRISTINE HARRISON, a/k/a Sergeant Harrison; SERGEANT BRIAN DUVAL, a/k/a Sergeant Duval,

Defendants – Appellees,

and

STEPHANIE SINGLETON,

Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Anderson. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge. (8:11-cv-02285-RBH)

Submitted: December 12, 2012 Decided: December 18, 2012

Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Herbert Alonzo Robinson, Appellant Pro Se. Hugh Wilcox Buyck, Gordon Wade Cooper, BUYCK LAW FIRM, Charleston, South Carolina; Elloree Ann Ganes, Thomas Happel Scurry, HOOD LAW FIRM, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2 PER CURIAM:

Herbert Alonzo Robinson appeals the district court’s

order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and

denying relief on his

42 U.S.C. § 1983

(2006) complaint. We

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. Robinson v. Wilson, No. 8:11-cv-02285-RBH (D.S.C.

Aug. 9, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

3

Reference

Status
Unpublished