United States v. Curtis Lay

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

United States v. Curtis Lay

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-7392

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

CURTIS JAMES LAY,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, Senior District Judge. (8:97-cr-00313-PJM-1)

Submitted: December 13, 2012 Decided: December 18, 2012

Before MOTZ, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Curtis James Lay, Appellant Pro Se. Barbara Slaymaker Sale, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Curtis James Lay appeals the district court’s orders

denying his

18 U.S.C. § 3582

(c)(2) (2006) motion for a sentence

reduction and his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm

for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v.

Lay, No. 8:97-cr-00313-PJM-1 (D. Md. July 30, 2012; Dec. 4,

2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished