U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2012

United States v. Jeremy Danner

United States v. Jeremy Danner
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided December 18, 2012 · Floyd, Per Curiam, Shedd, Wynn
500 F. App'x 236

United States v. Jeremy Danner

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Jeremy Ray Danner appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for a reduction *237 of his sentence based on Amendment 750. Our review of the record demonstrates that Amendment 750 did not reduce Dan-ner’s Guidelines range of 240 months. See United States v. Munn, 595 F.3d 183, 187 (4th Cir. 2010). Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.