U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2012

United States v. Sterling Drew

United States v. Sterling Drew
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided December 19, 2012 · Floyd, Motz, Per Curiam, Wynn
491 F. App'x 405

United States v. Sterling Drew

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Sterling Lee Drew appeals the district court’s order denying a sentence reduction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Drew, No. 5:06-cr-00022-RLVCH-9 (W.D.N.C. Sept. 26, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.