United States v. William Eckles, Jr.
United States v. William Eckles, Jr.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-7768
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
WILLIAM LARNELL ECKLES, JR.,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Richard L. Voorhees, District Judge. (5:00-cr-00046-RLV-4)
Submitted: December 13, 2012 Decided: December 19, 2012
Before MOTZ, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
William Larnell Eckles, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
William Larnell Eckles, Jr., appeals the district
court’s order granting his
18 U.S.C. § 3582(C)(2) (2006) motion
for a sentence reduction. * We have reviewed the record and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. United States v. Eckles, No.
5:00-cr-00046-RLV-4 (W.D.N.C. Sept. 26, 2012). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
* Although the district court granted Eckles’s motion, Eckles contends on appeal that he was entitled to an even further reduction.
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished