UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-7365

ANTHONY WILLIAMS,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Formally sued as Rodney Blacknall ATF Agent; Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives Bureau,

Defendant - Appellee.

No. 12-7381

ANTHONY WILLIAMS,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

OFFICER BRIGGS, Officer, CMPD, sued individually and in their official capacity; ROBERT J. WISE, Officer, CMPD, sued individually and in their official capacity; CHIP R. BUSKER, Sergeant, CMPD, sued individually and in their official capacity; KYLE J. O'DELL, Officer, CMPD, sued individually and in their official capacity; J. E. HARTNESS, Officer, CMPD, sued individually and in their official capacity,

Defendants - Appellees. No. 12-7386

ANTHONY WILLIAMS,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

RICK F. HETZEL, SBI Agent, North Carolina State Bureau of Investigation,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert J. Conrad, Jr., Chief District Judge. (3:11-cv-00594-RJC; 3:12-cv-00097- RJC; 3:11-cv-00443-RJC)

Submitted: December 13, 2012 Decided: December 20, 2012

Before MOTZ, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Anthony Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Paul Bradford Taylor, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Asheville, North Carolina; Richard Rustin Perlungher, CHARLOTTE-MECKLENBURG POLICE DEPARTMENT, Charlotte, North Carolina; Angel Evon Gray, Jennifer Joy Strickland, Assistant Attorneys General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2 PER CURIAM:

Anthony Williams appeals the district court’s orders

denying relief on his

(2006) complaints related

to his 2002 arrest and 2003 conviction and denying his motions

for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. Williams v. United States, No.

3:11-cv-00594-RJC (W.D.N.C. June 11, 2012); Williams v. Briggs,

No. 3:12-cv-00097-RJC (W.D.N.C. May 31 & Aug. 6, 2012);

Williams v. Hetzel, No. 3:11-cv-00443-RJC (W.D.N.C. July 3 &

Aug. 6, 2012). We grant Williams’ motion to substitute brief.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

3