United States v. Tony Hoey

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

United States v. Tony Hoey

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-7354

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

TONY HOEY, a/k/a Sld Dft 13,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Shelby. Martin K. Reidinger, District Judge. (4:96-cr-00053-MR-13)

Submitted: December 20, 2012 Decided: December 26, 2012

Before KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Tony Hoey, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Lee Edwards, Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorneys, Jill Westmoreland Rose, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Asheville, North Carolina; Adam Christopher Morris, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Tony Hoey appeals the district court’s orders denying

relief on his motion for reduction of sentence,

18 U.S.C. § 3582

(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. See United States v. Hoey, No. 4:96-cr-

00053-MR-13 (W.D.N.C. June 6, 2012; Aug. 3, 2012). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before this court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished