United States v. Jeltress Williamson

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

United States v. Jeltress Williamson

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-7116

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

JELTRESS CHENICO WILLIAMSON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. James A. Beaty, Jr., District Judge. (1:98-cr-00190-JAB-1)

Submitted: December 20, 2012 Decided: December 26, 2012

Before KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jeltress Chenico Williamson, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Michael Hamilton, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Jeltress Chenico Williamson appeals the district

court’s order denying his

18 U.S.C. § 3582

(c)(2) (2006) motion

for a sentence reduction. On appeal, we confine our review to

the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R.

34(b). Because Williamson’s informal brief does not challenge

the basis for the district court’s disposition, Williamson has

forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. Accordingly,

we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before this court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished