Richard Peamon v. Leslie Gradet

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Richard Peamon v. Leslie Gradet

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-1998

RICHARD PEAMON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

LESLIE GRADET, Clerk of the Court; PETER B. KRAUSER,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William D. Quarles, Jr., District Judge. (1:12-cv-01241-WDQ)

Submitted: December 20, 2012 Decided: December 26, 2012

Before KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Richard Peamon, Appellant Pro Se. Hugh Scott Curtis, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Richard Peamon seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying relief on his

42 U.S.C. § 1983

(2006) complaint

alleging an error in the docketing of his state court action * and

the district court’s order denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e)

motion to alter or amend the judgment. We have reviewed the

record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave

to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal. Peamon v.

Gradet, No. 1:12-cv-01241-WDQ (D. Md. July 12 & Aug. 2, 2012).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

* That error was corrected.

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished