Ophelia De'Lonta v. Harold Clarke
Ophelia De'Lonta v. Harold Clarke
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-7634
OPHELIA AZRIEL DE’LONTA,
Plaintiff - Appellant, v.
HAROLD CLARKE, Director, VADOC; G. K. WASHINGTON, Regional Admin; LARRY EDMONDS, Warden, BKCC; MAJOR C. DAVIS, Chief of Security; DAVIS, Institutional Investigator; AGENT WATSON, Internal Affairs Unit; LISA LANG, Staff Psychologist; SARAH PRUITT, Correctional Officer,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, Senior District Judge. (7:11-cv-00483-JCT-RSB)
Submitted: December 20, 2012 Decided: December 27, 2012
Before KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ophelia Azriel De’Lonta, Appellant Pro Se. John Michael Parsons Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia; Antonio Pierre Jackson, LAW OFFICE OF A. PIERRE JACKSON, P.C., Hampden-Sydney, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Ophelia Azriel De’Lonta seeks to appeal the district
court’s order dismissing all but one Defendant, Sarah Pruitt, in
De’Lonta’s
42 U.S.C. § 1983(2006) action. This court may
exercise jurisdiction only over final orders,
28 U.S.C. § 1291(2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders,
28 U.S.C. § 1292(2006); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial
Indus. Loan Corp.,
337 U.S. 541, 545-46(1949). The order
De’Lonta seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an
appealable interlocutory or collateral order, as it disposes of
fewer than all the parties involved in this lawsuit.
Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished