U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2012

United States v. Darlene Eckles

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided December 27, 2012 · King, Duncan, Hamilton

502 F. App'x 265

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Darlene Eckles appeals the district court’s order granting her motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). * We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Eckles, No. 5:05-cr-00009-RLV-DCK-5 (W.D.N.C. Aug. 23, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Although the district court granted Eckles § 3582 relief, the reduction granted by the court did not reduce her sentence to the full extent requested.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.