United States v. James Wallace

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

United States v. James Wallace

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-7588

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

JAMES THOMAS WALLACE,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Terry L. Wooten, District Judge. (4:03-cr-00918-TLW-1)

Submitted: December 20, 2012 Decided: December 27, 2012

Before KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James Thomas Wallace, Appellant Pro Se. Arthur Bradley Parham, Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

James Thomas Wallace appeals the district court’s

order denying his motion to modify sentence under

18 U.S.C. § 3582

(c)(1)(B) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Wallace’s motion for

appointment of counsel and affirm the order of the district

court. United States v. Wallace, No. 4:03-cr-00918-TLW-1

(D.S.C. July 24, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before this court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished