United States v. James Wallace
United States v. James Wallace
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-7588
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
JAMES THOMAS WALLACE,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Terry L. Wooten, District Judge. (4:03-cr-00918-TLW-1)
Submitted: December 20, 2012 Decided: December 27, 2012
Before KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
James Thomas Wallace, Appellant Pro Se. Arthur Bradley Parham, Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
James Thomas Wallace appeals the district court’s
order denying his motion to modify sentence under
18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(B) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Wallace’s motion for
appointment of counsel and affirm the order of the district
court. United States v. Wallace, No. 4:03-cr-00918-TLW-1
(D.S.C. July 24, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished