United States v. Joe Darby

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

United States v. Joe Darby

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-6585

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

JOE NATHAN DARBY,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge. (4:05-cr-00465-RBH-1)

Submitted: December 18, 2012 Decided: December 27, 2012

Before MOTZ, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Joe Nathan Darby, Appellant Pro Se. Arthur Bradley Parham, Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Joe Nathan Darby appeals the district court’s order

denying his

18 U.S.C. § 3582

(c)(2) (2006) motion. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm for the reason stated by the district court. United

States v. Darby, No. 4:05-cr-00465-RBH-1 (D.S.C. Mar. 5, 2012).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished