Bert Parker v. George Trent

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Bert Parker v. George Trent

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-7224

BERT V.E. PARKER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

GEORGE TRENT; DONNA KUROSKI; ASHLEY GINANNI; JOHN DOE, Unknown,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. Irene M. Keeley, District Judge. (1:10-cv-00120-IMK-DJJ)

Submitted: November 21, 2012 Decided: December 28, 2012

Before WYNN and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Bert V.E. Parker, Appellant Pro Se. Susan Llewellyn Deniker, Sara Ellen Hauptfuehrer, STEPTOE & JOHNSON, PLLC, Bridgeport, West Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Bert V.E. Parker appeals the district court’s orders

adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge, dismissing

Parker’s

42 U.S.C. § 1983

(2006) complaint, and denying Parker’s

Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion to amend. We have reviewed the

record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for

the reasons stated by the district court. Parker v. Trent, No.

1:10-cv-00120-IMK-DJJ (N.D. W. Va. Jan. 10 & June 20, 2012). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished