Coles v. McNeely
Opinion of the Court
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Timothy Lee Coles appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Coles v. Mcneely, No. 3:11-ev-00130-REP, 2011 WL 3703117 (E.D.Va. Aug. 23, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Timothy Lee COLES v. K. McNEELY, Inmate Hearing Officer, Buckingham Correctional Center L.T. Edmonds, Warden of Buckingham Correctional Center (BKCC) G.K. Washington, Central Region Regional Director L. Mickelson, Food Service Head Supervisor, Sussex II State Prison L. Shaw, Correctional Institutional Rehabilitation Counselor, Sussex II State Prison J. Harris, Unit Manager of Housing Unit 2, Sussex II State Prison Rodriquez, Inmate Hearing Officer, Sussex II State Prison D. Everett, Warden, Sussex II State Prison V. Purman, Correctional Officer, Sussex II State Prison V. Knight, Correctional Officer, Sussex II State Prison S. Gray, Sgt., Sussex II State Prison L. Thomas, Lt., Sussex II State Prison A. David Robinson, Eastern Regional Director
- Cited By
- 2 cases
- Status
- Published