Petito v. Washington Post Co.

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Petito v. Washington Post Co., 466 F. App'x 191 (4th Cir. 2012)

Petito v. Washington Post Co.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM:

Christopher Petito, Stephen Sieber, and Ronald Williams appeal from the district court’s order affirming the bankruptcy court’s order dismissing their complaint. We have reviewed the record on appeal and the informal briefs filed by the parties and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Petito v. The Washington Post Companies, No. 8:11-cv-01314-RWT (D.Md., July 8, 2011). We deny the motion to recuse the lower court judges and deny the motion to consolidate this appeal with Appeal No. 11-2208. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Reference

Full Case Name
Christopher PETITO Stephen C. Sieber Ronald Williams v. The WASHINGTON POST COMPANIES Williams & Connolly LLP Angie's List Jeanne Crouse Leander Barnhill Cheryl Rose James Hoffman Offit/Kirman Keith Havens Clarkson McDow Ice Miller, LLP Bracewell and Giuliani, LLP Paul Pogue Thomas Meadows John Kelly District of Columbia Robert Harris John Poole Todd Johannsen Monica Hammock
Status
Published