Scott v. City of Norfolk
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Scott v. City of Norfolk, 467 F. App'x 174 (4th Cir. 2012)
Scott v. City of Norfolk
Opinion of the Court
Michael A. Scott appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Scott v. City of Norfolk, No. 2:10-cv-00611-RAJ-DEM (E.D.Va. Sept. 30, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Michael A. SCOTT v. CITY OF NORFOLK Regina V.K. Williams Bernard A. Pishko K. Hannan S. Michael E. Zysk
- Status
- Published