U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2012

United States v. Howze

United States v. Howze
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided February 24, 2012
467 F. App'x 241

United States v. Howze

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM:

Theodore Howze, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reduction of sentence, 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Howze, No. 3:98-cr-00299-GCM-1 (W.D.N.C. Sept. 22, 2011). We deny the motion for appointment of counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.