U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2012

United States v. Kyle

United States v. Kyle
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided February 28, 2012 · Davis, Diaz, Motz
468 F. App'x 326

United States v. Kyle

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Vincent Pernell Kyle appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Kyle, No. 1:08-cr-00035-GMW-PMS-4 (W.D.Va. Dec. 6, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.