U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2012

Hogge v. Stephens

Hogge v. Stephens
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided March 13, 2012 · Agee, Shedd, Wynn
469 F. App'x 160

Hogge v. Stephens

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Thomas Kevin Hogge appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hogge v. Stephens, No. 3:09-cv-00582-JRS, 2010 WL 3834849 (E.D. Va. Sept. 24, 2010); 2011 WL 2161100 (June 1), 2011 WL 4352268 (Sept. 6 & 16, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.