Sun v. Loadholt

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Sun v. Loadholt, 469 F. App'x 160 (4th Cir. 2012)

Sun v. Loadholt

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

' Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Joseph C. Sun appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Sun v. Loadholt, No. 9:08-cv-04021-RMG, 2011 WL 5239727 (D.S.C. Nov. 1, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Reference

Full Case Name
Joseph C. SUN v. Joe L. LOADHOLT, and Stacey Smith
Status
Published