U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2012

Amr v. Virginia State University

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided March 19, 2012 · Duncan, Floyd, Hamilton

469 F. App'x 208

Counsel

Salame M. Amr, Appellant Pro Se. Gregory Clayton Fleming, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Ronald Nicholas Regnery, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, Virginia; Robert R. Musick, Thompson McMullan, PC, Richmond, Virginia; Margaret Sander, Reed Smith, LLP, Richmond, Virginia; Jeremy David Capps, Harman, Claytor, Corrigan & Wellman, Richmond, Virginia, for Appel-lees.

Opinion of the Court

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Salame M. Amr appeals the district court’s orders accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his complaint with prejudice and granting the Defendants’ motions for sanctions. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Amr v. Virginia State Univ., No. 3:10-cv-00787-REP-MHL, 2011 WL 4407429 (E.D.Va. Sept. 21, 2011). Amr’s pending motion to hold appeal in abeyance is denied as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.