United States v. Pitts
United States v. Pitts
Opinion of the Court
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Edgar Nelson Pitts appeals the district court’s order granting his motion for sentence reduction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). On appeal, Pitts contends that he is actually innocent of his drug convictions. However, this challenge to his convictions cannot be remedied by way of a § 3582 motion. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. See United States v. Pitts, No. 6:94-cr-70068-JCT-2 (W.D.Va. Oct. 18, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.