U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2012

Brown v. Patrick

Brown v. Patrick
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided April 3, 2012
471 F. App'x 111

Counsel

Jevon Edward Brown, Appellant Pro Se.

Brown v. Patrick

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM:

Jevon Edward Brown appeals the district court’s order denying his self-styled motion for permission to appeal, which the district court construed as a Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion, and has filed motions for appointment of counsel and for a transcript at government expense. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Brown’s motions and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Brown v. Patrick, No. 1:08-cv-01345-TSE-TRJ (E.D. Va. filed Nov. 2, 2011; entered Nov. 3, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.