United States v. Mitchell
United States v. Mitchell
471 F. App'x 214
United States v. Mitchell
Opinion of the Court
Sidney Kenneth Mitchell appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for a reduction of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Mitchell, No. 3:06-cr-00068-JPB-1, 2011 WL 6322828 (N.D.W.Va. Dec. 16, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.